
Indonesia’s High Court recently upheld the country’s controversial Blasphemy Law saying that it is still needed to maintain public order among religious groups.
“If the Blasphemy Law was scrapped before a new law was enacted … it was feared that misuses and contempt of religion would occur and trigger conflicts in society,” explained court justice Akil Mochtar, one of eight judges who upheld the law Monday.
Of the eight only one justice voted against the 1965 law, which permits the ruling government to ban religious groups that “distort” or “misrepresent” any of the country’s six official religions – Islam, Catholicism, Protestantism, Buddhism, Hinduism and Confucianism.
Justice Indrati, who voted against the Law and is the only woman on the Constitutional Court, stated in her dissenting opinion that the Blasphemy Law was badly flawed in many areas related to human rights and emphasised the “arbitrary actions” often elicited in the law’s execution.
Muslim countries with similar laws often experience situations where members of the majority religions too easily persecute religious minorities and unorthodox sects. The law leads to discrimination, harassment, and violence against these minorities, argue rights groups fighting against the constitutionality of the Blasphemy Law.
Those convicted of heresy could find themselves serving jail time of around 5 years, says the Christian Post.
(For the full article, please go to http://christianpost.com).





